August 16, 2022
The James Webb Space Telescope is making the news and delighting viewers with pictures of our universe very far away. In the process the information concerning early star formations and galaxies reveals data concerning redshift velocity and extrapolations concerning dark matter presence that contradict well established theories of the origin of our universe. Now we're reading criticisms of the big bang theory. The telescope has infrared cameras very sensitive so that light from stars less than 100,000,000 years after the beginning of the universe now judged to be 13.7 billion years old (but of course now this may be incorrect). For an interesting simulated space journey thanks to the telescope see https://mashable.com/article/james-webb-space-telescope-cartwheel-galaxy
Well, in another example of what you thought of as factual and true but now...an article in MindMatters "Has A Superintellect Monkeyed With Our Universe's Physics? https://mindmatters.ai/2022/08/has-a-superintellect-monkeyed-with-our-universes-physics/ The article describes how astronomer Fred Hoyle struggled with not understanding how come there is so much carbon atoms in the universe since nuclear fusion as so far understood in star lives changes hydrogen (proton) to helium then the next step is carbon but to get there is theoretically very difficult to understand for Hoyle though it through further reading I learned that supergiant stars can get enough heat to fuse helium to carbon (the next fusion is oxygen all the way to iron where is stops). To Hoyle the puzzle only could be solved by postulating that something very fortuitous occurred in our universe to allow so much carbon because logic was betting against this. Carbon atom in our universe has chemical characteristics to allow formation of carbohydrates and using nitrogen to have proteins so without so much carbon no life as we know it can occur. Well, my good friend in the know has pointed out that the many universe theory allows for this by chance. "*Everybody* knows that there are 9.65479044 gazillion parallel Universes (more or less), of variable, mind-bending sets of physical laws and contortions, many of them still undetected, or even un-detectable, and that the reason ours is so precisely suitable for life to exist and flourish is that it is, by accident and the Law of Averages, the only one of those gazillions that is so suitable, and therefore there ain’t no life on any of the others, only us,here. Not Divine Creation, but Anthropomorphic self-selection!(With apologies to the Gods, should any of Them be listening to this lowly life form at this moment in Time. Whatever *that* might be.)
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/11/opinion/alex-jones-wellness-conspiracy.html
The truth is, our government is not founded upon the rights of gods, but upon the rights of men. Our Constitution was framed, not to declare and uphold the deity of Christ, but the sacredness of humanity. Ours is the first government made by the people and for the people. It is the only nation with which the gods have had nothing to do. And yet there are some judges dishonest and cowardly enough to solemnly decide that this is a Christian country, and that our free institutions are based upon the infamous laws of Jehovah.
Robert Green Ingersoll, “Individuality” (1873) from “The Gods and Other Lectures” https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/826152-it-is-contended-by-many-that-ours-is-a-christian
So of course I am reminded here of our Supreme Court recent decisions that have caused such mayhem and controversy. The court has decided that a woman's right to decide on her health care related to pregnancy should be left to each individual state law and that previous ruling in Roe vs Wade is no longer valid. So the court is endorsing a approach to the constitution of not changing with the times but keeping things original. In my mind, I'm wondering if the court believes that we should have a democracy at all since some of the state have criminalized a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy as punishable with fines and imprisonment! So I can decide to someday say "Rebecca I have some holes in my socks please darn them!" Good luck Leonard you'll be a lonely man!
I'm so disappointed with the Supreme Court ruling concerning school prayer since the football coach who was sanctioned blatantly used prayer with a state legislator in attendance on one occasion and by his position as coach influenced the team to pray with him while accepting salary for his employment at a public institution! The justices writing the affirmative decision ignored these facts.
Well, no matter how well read you are, how intelligent you are, how world experienced you are, how well coached and advised by experts you are and how rich you are you have feet of clay! Rich and powerful people often in the news some publishing essays and books, some making statements concerning our state of affairs often have public relations employees and contracts with media outlets to get noticed in the news. The problem to me is that some people accept their article, writings, and public relations events as truthful and correct. I do admire some people who are more skilled and knowledgeable than me but some of the people who admired by others do seem more snake oil and full of themselves to me. So recently for example I looked up any information and studies showing if wealth leads to being smarter. Actually the opposite seems to be the case. Wealth does bring benefits where you can be more insulated from others and even have public relations staff tout your alleged wisdom. Lying a human trait familiar to all of us seems more sensational with celebrities.
So knowing we all have feet of clay brings me to a clearer closing to this essay. As parents and spouses we attempt to support and love our family members but in fact can we at times be inhibiting their development and misleading them even? To an outsider some of the family dynamics we encounter in others lives we learn about seems so obviously dysfunctional but to the parent and significant other so normal and wholesome. The examples I'm thinking about are too fresh and personal to discuss especially since the same applies to me and my own "self righteous" conclusions about others. Life decisions and directions to take involves risks which to some is too frightening so they hunker down and continue to go on the same path but then again repeated roadblocks and unhappiness may result or they risk change and the outcome may be in doubt but better.
Truth and Lies by Louise Witwit
https://poemhome.net/poetry-about-lies/
When explanations are hard to produce
Lie after lie comes shining through
Truth gets locked away
For reasons only known to yourself
Truth may hurt
but the lie hurts more
one lie to cover another
what was the first lie
can you remember?
So much hurt and
too many lies
what's the truth
will I ever know
can I ever separate the two?
Leonard
Comments
Post a Comment